ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs DAAS KRIETION — 99/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001372026

Filing Number

99/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAAS KRIETION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act Section 07 for violations in Dholka municipality and sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (or 3 days imprisonment in default). The judgment considered mitigating factors including the accused's poor economic status, family responsibilities, and first-time offense, imposing the minimum permissible punishment to allow rehabilitation while maintaining societal deterrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act Section 07 for violations in Dholka municipality and sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (or 3 days imprisonment in default). The judgment considered mitigating factors including the accused's poor economic status, family responsibilities, and first-time offense, imposing the minimum permissible punishment to allow rehabilitation while maintaining societal deterrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case