ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs GAJANAND MOBILE SHOP — 96/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001342026

Filing Number

96/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

96/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.GAJANAND MOBILE SHOP

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary: The Dholka Magistrate Court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, for operating a mobile shop without proper authorization in the Dholka Municipal area. Considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offence, family responsibilities, and commitment to future compliance, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum penalty, balancing justice with rehabilitation principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
11-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
06-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
16-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 96/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Dholka Magistrate Court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, for operating a mobile shop without proper authorization in the Dholka Municipal area. Considering the accused's impoverished background, first-time offence, family responsibilities, and commitment to future compliance, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum penalty, balancing justice with rehabilitation principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.