ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs BAPASITARAM KIRANA STORE HIMATBHAI RAMESHBHAI — 95/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001332026

Case disposed

Filing Number

95/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

16-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) SHOPS AND ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BAPASITARAM KIRANA STORE HIMATBHAI RAMESHBHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

06-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for violating licensing provisions, finding him guilty of operating a store without proper authorization in Dholka municipality area. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic status, first-time offense, family circumstances with dependent children, and commitment to reform, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum penalty, applying principles of judicial discretion to balance justice with rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for violating licensing provisions, finding him guilty of operating a store without proper authorization in Dholka municipality area. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic status, first-time offense, family circumstances with dependent children, and commitment to reform, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum penalty, applying principles of judicial discretion to balance justice with rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case