ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs BAPASITARAM KIRANA STORE HIMATBHAI RAMESHBHAI — 95/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH070001332026
Filing Number
95/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
95/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA
Judge
6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BAPASITARAM KIRANA STORE HIMATBHAI RAMESHBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 6-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for violating licensing provisions, finding him guilty of operating a store without proper authorization in Dholka municipality area. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic status, first-time offense, family circumstances with dependent children, and commitment to reform, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum penalty, applying principles of judicial discretion to balance justice with rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for violating licensing provisions, finding him guilty of operating a store without proper authorization in Dholka municipality area. Considering the accused's poor socioeconomic status, first-time offense, family circumstances with dependent children, and commitment to reform, the court imposed a reduced sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum penalty, applying principles of judicial discretion to balance justice with rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts