ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs KIVA MOBILE BHAVESHBHAI — 88/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001262026

Filing Number

88/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.KIVA MOBILE BHAVESHBHAI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, finding him guilty of violating labor laws in Dholka municipality. Considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances as a poor person from a large family with minimal earning members and his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum penalty, emphasizing that proportionate punishment allows offenders to maintain dignity in society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
11-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
06-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
16-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, finding him guilty of violating labor laws in Dholka municipality. Considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances as a poor person from a large family with minimal earning members and his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum penalty, emphasizing that proportionate punishment allows offenders to maintain dignity in society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.