ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs SHRE UMIYA TREDERS — 87/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001252026

Filing Number

87/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRE UMIYA TREDERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Criminal Case No. 87/2026 - Dholka Municipal Court Summary The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for violations in Dholka municipality area. Considering mitigating circumstances—the accused being from a poor background, sole earning family member, with children, first-time offender, and assurance of future lawful conduct—the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than maximum punishment, deeming lesser sentence appropriate and just. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Criminal Case No. 87/2026 - Dholka Municipal Court Summary The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for violations in Dholka municipality area. Considering mitigating circumstances—the accused being from a poor background, sole earning family member, with children, first-time offender, and assurance of future lawful conduct—the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹5,000 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than maximum punishment, deeming lesser sentence appropriate and just. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case