ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs SHIV SHAKTI DALBATI — 86/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001242026

Filing Number

86/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIV SHAKTI DALBATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for violating provisions related to labor regulations in Dholka municipality. Considering mitigating circumstances such as the accused's poor economic status, being the sole earner with children, and this being a first offense, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 5,000 fine instead of the maximum penalty, while noting that lenient sentencing would allow the accused to rehabilitate and maintain social dignity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for violating provisions related to labor regulations in Dholka municipality. Considering mitigating circumstances such as the accused's poor economic status, being the sole earner with children, and this being a first offense, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 5,000 fine instead of the maximum penalty, while noting that lenient sentencing would allow the accused to rehabilitate and maintain social dignity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case