ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs SHAKTI KRUPA PAN PARLAR — 85/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001232026

Filing Number

85/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

85/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAKTI KRUPA PAN PARLAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (with 3 days simple imprisonment in default). The judgment considers the accused's socioeconomic circumstances—being from a poor background with family dependents and no prior criminal record—as mitigating factors justifying the minimum sentence rather than maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act, Section 7, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (with 3 days simple imprisonment in default). The judgment considers the accused's socioeconomic circumstances—being from a poor background with family dependents and no prior criminal record—as mitigating factors justifying the minimum sentence rather than maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case