ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR vs PINTU BEUTYCARE AND KATALARI STORE — 79/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH070001172026

Filing Number

79/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

6-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK S CHAHAL GUMASTA INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PINTU BEUTYCARE AND KATALARI STORE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 79/2026 The court found the accused guilty under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for operating a beauty care shop without proper licensing in Dholka municipality area. Considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances (poor background, sole earner, first-time offender), the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹5,000 fine instead of maximum penalty, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 79/2026 The court found the accused guilty under the Gujarat Shops and Establishments Act for operating a beauty care shop without proper licensing in Dholka municipality area. Considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances (poor background, sole earner, first-time offender), the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹5,000 fine instead of maximum penalty, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default in case of non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case