PINAL RASIKBHAI LUHAR vs THE STATE Advocate - APP — 17/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Status: Reply Of I.O.. Next hearing: 16th May 2026.

Reply Of I.O. Next hearing 16-May-2026

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAH070000822026

Filing Number

17/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHOLKA

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINAL RASIKBHAI LUHAR

    Adv. M M SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. 16-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court modified the fine amount imposed on the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and related provisions. The fine was reduced from Rs. 18,50,000 to Rs. 18,00,000, while all other parts of the original judgment remain unchanged. The order was passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on 30/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Restored

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 27-Apr-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 23-Apr-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 20-Apr-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 11-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 07-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 02-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 25-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 21-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 17-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 11-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 10-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 06-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 30-Jan-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court modified the fine amount imposed on the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and related provisions. The fine was reduced from Rs. 18,50,000 to Rs. 18,00,000, while all other parts of the original judgment remain unchanged. The order was passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on 30/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case