Harsiddhi Electro Me. Pvt. Ltd. thr. Director Vipin R. Panchal and Jignesh A. Panchal thr. Chirag R vs Yogi Electricals Advocate - A.C.THAKER — 1003/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.
SMST R - SUMMARY SUIT - REGULAR
CNR: GJAH030021892019
Filing Number
1003/2019
Filing Date
20-07-2019
Registration No
1003/2019
Registration Date
20-07-2019
Court
SMALL CAUSE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Harsiddhi Electro Me. Pvt. Ltd. thr. Director Vipin R. Panchal and Jignesh A. Panchal thr. Chirag R
Adv. C.J.PANCHAL
Respondent(s)
Yogi Electricals Advocate - A.C.THAKER
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 09-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Small Cause Court at Ahmedabad partly allowed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,27,681/- for sheet metal fabrication job work delivered to the defendant on 01.09.2013. The court found the plaintiff proved delivery through uncontroverted invoice and delivery challan documents, and reduced the claim to Rs. 1,17,681/- (deducting the Rs. 10,000/- already paid). Instead of the claimed 18% interest, the court awarded 9% per annum from the suit filing date until realization, citing the commercial nature of the transaction and principles of reasonable compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Small Cause Court at Ahmedabad partly allowed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,27,681/- for sheet metal fabrication job work delivered to the defendant on 01.09.2013. The court found the plaintiff proved delivery through uncontroverted invoice and delivery challan documents, and reduced the claim to Rs. 1,17,681/- (deducting the Rs. 10,000/- already paid). Instead of the claimed 18% interest, the court awarded 9% per annum from the suit filing date until realization, citing the commercial nature of the transaction and principles of reasonable compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts