Nilkanth Yogashram Mahadev Trust (Reg. Public Trust Reg. No-A/864/Ahmedabad) vs Kamalkumar Murtilal Jain — 281/2021
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 13. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
SMCST - SMALL CAUSE SUIT
CNR: GJAH030013082021
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
280/2021
Filing Date
02-11-2021
Registration No
281/2021
Registration Date
02-11-2021
Court
SMALL CAUSE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nilkanth Yogashram Mahadev Trust (Reg. Public Trust Reg. No-A/864/Ahmedabad)
Adv. R S PATHAN
Shree Yogi Maheshnathji Shashtri (Trusti plaintiff No.1 Trusti)
Respondent(s)
Kamalkumar Murtilal Jain
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 28-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 01-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted the interim injunction application in favor of the plaintiffs (Nilkanth Yogashram Mahadev Trust) against the defendant-tenant. The defendant is restrained from transferring, assigning, subletting, or making alterations, demolitions, illegal encroachments, or constructions on the suit premises without written consent of the plaintiffs until final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience in favor of plaintiffs, and irreparable harm if injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted the interim injunction application in favor of the plaintiffs (Nilkanth Yogashram Mahadev Trust) against the defendant-tenant. The defendant is restrained from transferring, assigning, subletting, or making alterations, demolitions, illegal encroachments, or constructions on the suit premises without written consent of the plaintiffs until final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience in favor of plaintiffs, and irreparable harm if injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts