Nilkanth Yogashram Mahadev Trust (Reg. Public Trust Reg. No-A/864/Ahmedabad) vs Zebarben Bababhai — 280/2021
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 13. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
SMCST - SMALL CAUSE SUIT
CNR: GJAH030013072021
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
279/2021
Filing Date
02-11-2021
Registration No
280/2021
Registration Date
02-11-2021
Court
SMALL CAUSE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nilkanth Yogashram Mahadev Trust (Reg. Public Trust Reg. No-A/864/Ahmedabad)
Adv. R S PATHAN
Shree Yogi Maheshnathji Shashtri (Trusti plaintiff No.1 Trusti)
Respondent(s)
Zebarben Bababhai
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 28-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 01-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Interim injunction application allowed. The court granted the plaintiff's request to restrain the defendant (tenant) from transferring, assigning, subletting, or making alterations to the suit premises without written consent, and from making encroachments or constructions until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and refusal would cause irreparable injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Interim injunction application allowed. The court granted the plaintiff's request to restrain the defendant (tenant) from transferring, assigning, subletting, or making alterations to the suit premises without written consent, and from making encroachments or constructions until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and refusal would cause irreparable injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts