Shri Shankar Tarders A Name Firm, Owner- Manishkumar Kanaiyalal Maheta vs Mahadev Kirana Stores A Name Firm, Owner- Amarsinh — 516/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 11th March 2026.
SMST R - SUMMARY SUIT - REGULAR
CNR: GJAH030012802024
Filing Number
517/2024
Filing Date
24-09-2024
Registration No
516/2024
Registration Date
24-09-2024
Court
SMALL CAUSE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-CHIEF JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Shankar Tarders A Name Firm, Owner- Manishkumar Kanaiyalal Maheta
Adv. M A KACHA
Respondent(s)
Mahadev Kirana Stores A Name Firm, Owner- Amarsinh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CHIEF JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
Disposed
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
SERVICE OF PROCESS
SERVICE OF PROCESS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE |
| 22-01-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE |
| 29-12-2025 | SERVICE OF PROCESS |
| 18-11-2025 | SERVICE OF PROCESS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit under Order-37 CPC, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 47,739 after the defendant failed to appear within the statutory ten-day period following service of summons by substitute service. The court awarded 6% interest per annum on the due amount from the date of suit until realization, rejecting the plaintiff's claim for 18% interest based on prevailing market rates and Section-34 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit under Order-37 CPC, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 47,739 after the defendant failed to appear within the statutory ten-day period following service of summons by substitute service. The court awarded 6% interest per annum on the due amount from the date of suit until realization, rejecting the plaintiff's claim for 18% interest based on prevailing market rates and Section-34 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts