Rajeshkumar Natvarlal Solanki vs Sunilkumar Mansukhlal Pithadiya - Owner of Shivam Sewing Company Advocate - R G MODI — 221/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 002. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
SMCST - SMALL CAUSE SUIT
CNR: GJAH030011952014
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
221/2014
Filing Date
25-03-2014
Registration No
221/2014
Registration Date
25-03-2014
Court
SMALL CAUSE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajeshkumar Natvarlal Solanki
Adv. K R CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
Sunilkumar Mansukhlal Pithadiya - Owner of Shivam Sewing Company Advocate - R G MODI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 20-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary: H.R.P. Suit No. 221 of 2014 was dismissed for default by the Small Cause Court, Ahmedabad on 24.01.2018. After issues were framed on 4.3.2015, the plaintiff failed to file evidence despite multiple opportunities and did not appear for evidence on the hearing date nor filed an adjournment application. The dismissal was ordered under Order 9 Rule 3 of the CPC with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: H.R.P. Suit No. 221 of 2014 was dismissed for default by the Small Cause Court, Ahmedabad on 24.01.2018. After issues were framed on 4.3.2015, the plaintiff failed to file evidence despite multiple opportunities and did not appear for evidence on the hearing date nor filed an adjournment application. The dismissal was ordered under Order 9 Rule 3 of the CPC with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts