Abdulhamid Abdulgafar Shaikh vs Heir of Late Mohammad Yunus Noormahammad, Mohammad Fesal Mohammad Yunus Advocate - D M SAIYED — 155/2023

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 13. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

SMCST - SMALL CAUSE SUIT

CNR: GJAH030010282023

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

155/2023

Filing Date

12-07-2023

Registration No

155/2023

Registration Date

12-07-2023

Court

SMALL CAUSE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) RENTS, HOTEL AND LODGING HOUSE RATES CONTROL ACT, 1947 Section 13

Petitioner(s)

Abdulhamid Abdulgafar Shaikh

Adv. J N AHMEDI

Abdullatif Abdulhamid Shaikh

Adv. J N AHMEDI

Farzanaben Te D/o. Abdulhamid And Wife of Mohammadfaruk Baloch

Adv. J N AHMEDI

Respondent(s)

Heir of Late Mohammad Yunus Noormahammad, Mohammad Fesal Mohammad Yunus Advocate - D M SAIYED

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT

23-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

09-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

11-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

28-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

29-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

21-09-2023
ORDER

Summary: The interim injunction application (Exh.6) in H.R.P. Suit No.155/2023 is partly allowed. The court restrained the defendant, his agents, and servants from letting, subletting, assigning, transferring, or giving on leave and license the possession of the suit premises to any third party until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs (landlords) established a prima facie case with documentary evidence, and the balance of convenience favored granting the injunction to prevent irreparable loss, as the defendant's own statement indicated no intention to transfer the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The interim injunction application (Exh.6) in H.R.P. Suit No.155/2023 is partly allowed. The court restrained the defendant, his agents, and servants from letting, subletting, assigning, transferring, or giving on leave and license the possession of the suit premises to any third party until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs (landlords) established a prima facie case with documentary evidence, and the balance of convenience favored granting the injunction to prevent irreparable loss, as the defendant's own statement indicated no intention to transfer the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SMALL CAUSE COURT, AHMEDABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case