Heirs of Lt. Kiritbhai Bansilal Trivedi, Dikshita Kiritbhai Trivedi vs Gujarat Marble And Stone Company Advocate - J K CHOKSHI — 107/2023
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 13. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
SMCST - SMALL CAUSE SUIT
CNR: GJAH030007222023
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
107/2023
Filing Date
03-05-2023
Registration No
107/2023
Registration Date
03-05-2023
Court
SMALL CAUSE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Heirs of Lt. Kiritbhai Bansilal Trivedi, Dikshita Kiritbhai Trivedi
Adv. K S BRAHMBHATT
Heirs of Lt. Kiritbhai Bansilal Trivedi, Nilesh Kiritbhai Trivedi
Adv. K S BRAHMBHATT
Heirs of Lt. Kiritbhai Bansilal Trivedi, Haresh Kiritbhai Trivedi
Adv. K S BRAHMBHATT
Heirs of Lt. Kiritbhai Bansilal Trivedi, Alkesh Kiritbhai Trivedi
Adv. K S BRAHMBHATT
Heirs of Lt. Kiritbhai Bansilal Trivedi, Himanshu Kiritbhai Trivedi
Adv. K S BRAHMBHATT
Respondent(s)
Gujarat Marble And Stone Company Advocate - J K CHOKSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE COURT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 20-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 28-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 23-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary HRP Suit No. 107 of 2023 — The court granted the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The defendants are restrained from transferring or assigning possession of the disputed property until the suit's final disposal. The court found the plaintiff (landlord) established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary HRP Suit No. 107 of 2023 — The court granted the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The defendants are restrained from transferring or assigning possession of the disputed property until the suit's final disposal. The court found the plaintiff (landlord) established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts