KAMRAGNI ALIAS ARMANMIYA HABIBUDDIN USMANI MAULVI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - B N LIMBACHIA — 4057/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010097452025
Filing Number
4057/2025
Filing Date
18-12-2025
Registration No
4057/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192018220020
Police Station
DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMRAGNI ALIAS ARMANMIYA HABIBUDDIN USMANI MAULVI
Adv. M C HAKIM
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - B N LIMBACHIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the application of prisoner Kamargani alias Armanmiya Habibuddin Usmani, who alleged administrative harassment, illegal ATS interference, and denial of legal access during his 45-month custody at Sabarmati Central Jail. The court found his claims to be bare assertions lacking corroborative evidence, noting that prison records contradicted his allegations—showing he received 17 application papers in 2025 for legal representations and consistent medical treatment. The court characterized the application as an abuse of legal process and a habitual tactic by a disciplinary violator, observing that jail authorities were acting within the bounds of the Jail Manual, while directing that any legitimate medical or legal requests be considered in accordance with jail rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the application of prisoner Kamargani alias Armanmiya Habibuddin Usmani, who alleged administrative harassment, illegal ATS interference, and denial of legal access during his 45-month custody at Sabarmati Central Jail. The court found his claims to be bare assertions lacking corroborative evidence, noting that prison records contradicted his allegations—showing he received 17 application papers in 2025 for legal representations and consistent medical treatment. The court characterized the application as an abuse of legal process and a habitual tactic by a disciplinary violator, observing that jail authorities were acting within the bounds of the Jail Manual, while directing that any legitimate medical or legal requests be considered in accordance with jail rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts