KAMRAGNI ALIAS ARMANMIYA HABIBUDDIN USMANI MAULVI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - B N LIMBACHIA — 4057/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010097452025

Filing Number

4057/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

4057/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192018220020

Police Station

DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B
Indian Penal Code Section 302,307,120(B),201
Bombay Police (Gujarat Amendment and Validation) Act Section 135
The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015 Section 3(1)(1),3(2)
Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 Section 13(1)(A)(B),16(1)(A),17,18,20
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(A),27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMRAGNI ALIAS ARMANMIYA HABIBUDDIN USMANI MAULVI

    Adv. M C HAKIM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - B N LIMBACHIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the application of prisoner Kamargani alias Armanmiya Habibuddin Usmani, who alleged administrative harassment, illegal ATS interference, and denial of legal access during his 45-month custody at Sabarmati Central Jail. The court found his claims to be bare assertions lacking corroborative evidence, noting that prison records contradicted his allegations—showing he received 17 application papers in 2025 for legal representations and consistent medical treatment. The court characterized the application as an abuse of legal process and a habitual tactic by a disciplinary violator, observing that jail authorities were acting within the bounds of the Jail Manual, while directing that any legitimate medical or legal requests be considered in accordance with jail rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  13. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  14. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  16. 31-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  17. 26-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4057/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the application of prisoner Kamargani alias Armanmiya Habibuddin Usmani, who alleged administrative harassment, illegal ATS interference, and denial of legal access during his 45-month custody at Sabarmati Central Jail. The court found his claims to be bare assertions lacking corroborative evidence, noting that prison records contradicted his allegations—showing he received 17 application papers in 2025 for legal representations and consistent medical treatment. The court characterized the application as an abuse of legal process and a habitual tactic by a disciplinary violator, observing that jail authorities were acting within the bounds of the Jail Manual, while directing that any legitimate medical or legal requests be considered in accordance with jail rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case