SHIV METAL INDUSTRIES vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 3765/2024
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010087682024
Filing Number
3765/2024
Filing Date
05-Dec-2024
Registration No
3765/2024
Registration Date
05-Dec-2024
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
2-10th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIV METAL INDUSTRIES
Adv. K B THAKER
-
2.CHANDRAKANTBHAI PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
-
2.JIGARBHAI NATUBHAI SHAH OWNER OF YASHVI CORPORATION
Adv. J A PANDYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 3765/2024 The court allowed the delay condonation application filed by Shiv Metal Industries and Chandrakantbhai Patel, who sought to appeal a trial court's conviction order dated 28.10.2024 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (imposing a fine of Rs. 34,54,840 and 18 months imprisonment in default). Though the applicants filed their appeal 7 days late due to delayed receipt of certified copy, the court found sufficient cause for condonation, particularly because: (1) the matter was settled between parties with complainant's written consent to condone delay; and (2) the statutory right to appeal should not be forfeited on technicalities. However, the court imposed Rs. 25,000 cost on applicants for the delay, to be deposited with DLSA within 7 days, after which the appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
10th Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
10th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
10th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Order
10th Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Order
10th Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Order
10th Addl District Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
30-Jun-2025
Hearing
11th Addl District Judge
-
23-May-2025
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
13-May-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
29-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
15-Feb-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
30-Dec-2024
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2024
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
23-Dec-2024
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
18-Dec-2024
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 3765/2024
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 3765/2024 The court allowed the delay condonation application filed by Shiv Metal Industries and Chandrakantbhai Patel, who sought to appeal a trial court's conviction order dated 28.10.2024 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (imposing a fine of Rs. 34,54,840 and 18 months imprisonment in default). Though the applicants filed their appeal 7 days late due to delayed receipt of certified copy, the court found sufficient cause for condonation, particularly because: (1) the matter was settled between parties with complainant's written consent to condone delay; and (2) the statutory right to appeal should not be forfeited on technicalities. However, the court imposed Rs. 25,000 cost on applicants for the delay, to be deposited with DLSA within 7 days, after which the appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts