THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SAKET SON OF SUHAS GOKHALE Advocate - S VATSA — 126/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,465,467,468,471,120(B). Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJAH010085982023

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

126/2023

Filing Date

21-09-2023

Registration No

126/2023

Registration Date

21-09-2023

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191067220154

Police Station

CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,465,467,468,471,120(B)
Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66(C),66(D)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. A M PATEL

Respondent(s)

SAKET SON OF SUHAS GOKHALE Advocate - S VATSA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

21-05-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

15-05-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-05-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

23-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

16-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Interim Orders

01-03-2024
ORDER
12-06-2024
ORDER
16-04-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 126/2023 The court adjourned witness examination proceedings with a final directive: the prosecution must produce the witness on the next date without fail, or alternatively, the witness's evidence shall be recorded via video conferencing. The court rejected further adjournment requests, noting the witness's repeated inability to travel from Delhi due to his elderly parents' illness, and ordered all required documents be prepared in advance for either in-person or virtual examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 126/2023 The court adjourned witness examination proceedings with a final directive: the prosecution must produce the witness on the next date without fail, or alternatively, the witness's evidence shall be recorded via video conferencing. The court rejected further adjournment requests, noting the witness's repeated inability to travel from Delhi due to his elderly parents' illness, and ordered all required documents be prepared in advance for either in-person or virtual examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case