THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAYUDINMIYA AKBARMIYA SAIYAD Advocate - M R VAIDHYA — 14/2021
Case under The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015 Section 3(1)(1),3(1)(2),3(2),3(3),3(4). Status: HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
GCTOC - GUJARAT CONTROL OF TERRORISM AND ORGANIZED CRIME CASES
CNR: GJAH010072012021
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
14/2021
Filing Date
29-11-2021
Registration No
14/2021
Registration Date
29-11-2021
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217030210939
Police Station
SIDHPUR POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. B N LIMBACHIA
Respondent(s)
MAYUDINMIYA AKBARMIYA SAIYAD Advocate - M R VAIDHYA
NIZAMMIYA AKBARMIYA SAIYED
Adv. M R VAIDHYA
SABBIRAHEMAD GULABKHAN NAGORI(Abated)
Adv. A ZALA
RIYAZUDDIN MAYUDDINMIYA SAIYED
Adv. M R VAIDHYA
MUSTUFAMIYA AKBARMIYA SAIYED
Adv. M R VAIDHYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION
HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION
HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION
HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION
FRAMING OF CHARGE/PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION |
| 23-04-2026 | HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING ON FRAMING OF CHARGE/DISCHARGE APPLICATION |
| 05-03-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE/PLEA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Sabbir Ahmed Nagori (GujCTOC Case No. 14/2021) Outcome: The court rejected the discharge application filed by accused Sabbir Ahmed Nagori under Section 227 CrPC, ordering the case to proceed to trial on charges under the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime (GujCTOC) Act, 2015. Key Facts: Nagori challenged charges under GujCTOC Act sections 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(3), and 3(4), arguing he was improperly implicated based only on two 2016 FIRs—one where his car was used by co-accused and another where he was acquitted. He contended no offences were registered against him post-GujCTOC's December 2019 enactment. The prosecution countered that Nagori is prosecuted as a syndicate member, not individually; the syndicate committed 19 total offences (14 in preceding 10 years), establishing "continuing unlawful activity" under the Act. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence for trial, holding that more than one chargesheet must be filed against the syndicate collectively, not each individual member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Sabbir Ahmed Nagori (GujCTOC Case No. 14/2021) Outcome: The court rejected the discharge application filed by accused Sabbir Ahmed Nagori under Section 227 CrPC, ordering the case to proceed to trial on charges under the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime (GujCTOC) Act, 2015. Key Facts: Nagori challenged charges under GujCTOC Act sections 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(3), and 3(4), arguing he was improperly implicated based only on two 2016 FIRs—one where his car was used by co-accused and another where he was acquitted. He contended no offences were registered against him post-GujCTOC's December 2019 enactment. The prosecution countered that Nagori is prosecuted as a syndicate member, not individually; the syndicate committed 19 total offences (14 in preceding 10 years), establishing "continuing unlawful activity" under the Act. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence for trial, holding that more than one chargesheet must be filed against the syndicate collectively, not each individual member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts