THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ROHIT SON OF ASHWINBHAI BHAVRAVBHAI KADABE Advocate - A V GUPTA — 184/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A)(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJAH010059132024

Filing Number

184/2024

Filing Date

24-Jul-2024

Registration No

184/2024

Registration Date

24-Jul-2024

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

2-10th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192002210688

Police Station

ASLALI POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379(A)(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. R P THAKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT SON OF ASHWINBHAI BHAVRAVBHAI KADABE Advocate - A V GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: SC No. 184/2024 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted defendant Rohit Ashwinbhai Bhavravbhai Kadabe of charges under IPC Section 379(A)(3) (snatching). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While a gold chain was allegedly snatched from a 70-year-old woman during a crowded bus journey on August 29, 2021, the court determined critical evidentiary gaps undermined the conviction. The panchnamas (seizure records) documenting the arrest and recovery lacked substantive corroboration from the witnesses who signed them. The victim never directly identified the accused, no formal identification parade was conducted, and the chain was recovered post-arrest without establishing clear possession by the defendant immediately after the alleged theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    10th Addl District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    10th Addl District Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    10th Addl District Judge

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    10th Addl District Judge

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    10th Addl District Judge

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    11th Addl District Judge

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  12. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  15. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  16. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  17. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    11th Addl District Judge

  18. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    10th Addl District Judge

  19. 16-May-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    6th Addl District Judge

  20. 21-Apr-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    6th Addl District Judge

  21. 21-Mar-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    6th Addl District Judge

  22. 01-Feb-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    6th Addl District Judge

  23. 04-Jan-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    6th Addl District Judge

  24. 04-Dec-2024

    Warrant Of Arrest

    6th Addl District Judge

  25. 18-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl District Judge

  26. 23-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl District Judge

  27. 20-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl District Judge

  28. 27-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 24-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC No. 184/2024 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted defendant Rohit Ashwinbhai Bhavravbhai Kadabe of charges under IPC Section 379(A)(3) (snatching). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While a gold chain was allegedly snatched from a 70-year-old woman during a crowded bus journey on August 29, 2021, the court determined critical evidentiary gaps undermined the conviction. The panchnamas (seizure records) documenting the arrest and recovery lacked substantive corroboration from the witnesses who signed them. The victim never directly identified the accused, no formal identification parade was conducted, and the chain was recovered post-arrest without establishing clear possession by the defendant immediately after the alleged theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case