JAGDISHSINH CHANDANSINH CHAUHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 73/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJAH010036112022
Filing Number
73/2022
Filing Date
27-Jun-2022
Registration No
73/2022
Registration Date
27-Jun-2022
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGDISHSINH CHANDANSINH CHAUHAN
Adv. M N PANDIT
-
2.AMBALAL HARJIBHAI THAKOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
-
2.JUGAJI RANCHODJI THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
The court dismissed the criminal revision application as infructuous because the underlying criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1416 of 2020) had already been disposed of on 05.08.2023, with the applicants acquitted of all charges. Since the applicants had been acquitted, there was no justification in keeping the revision application pending, and the court found no merit in continuing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Dec-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Jun-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
26-May-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Apr-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Jan-2025
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
14-Oct-2024
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Sep-2024
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Jul-2024
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
08-May-2024
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
19-Mar-2024
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jan-2024
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Sep-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jul-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jun-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
24-May-2023
Process To Respondents
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-May-2023
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Apr-2023
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2023
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
27-Dec-2022
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-Nov-2022
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Oct-2022
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Sep-2022
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Aug-2022
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 73/2022
The court dismissed the criminal revision application as infructuous because the underlying criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1416 of 2020) had already been disposed of on 05.08.2023, with the applicants acquitted of all charges. Since the applicants had been acquitted, there was no justification in keeping the revision application pending, and the court found no merit in continuing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts