JYANTIBHAI MANUBHAI VALAND vs LEGAL HEIRS OF VIJIBEN DAUGHTER OF SHAKRABHAI AND WIFE OF SHANKARBHAI MANGALDAS VALAND Advocate - M I BRAHMBHATT — 30/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJAH010026002022
Filing Number
30/2022
Filing Date
05-May-2022
Registration No
30/2022
Registration Date
05-May-2022
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
4-9th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JYANTIBHAI MANUBHAI VALAND
Adv. Y B PANDIT
-
2.RANJANBEN MANUBHAI VALAND
-
3.BHAGVATIBEN MANUBHAI VALAND
-
4.INDUBEN MANUBHAI VALAND
-
5.USHABEN MANUBHAI VALAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.LEGAL HEIRS OF VIJIBEN DAUGHTER OF SHAKRABHAI AND WIFE OF SHANKARBHAI MANGALDAS VALAND Advocate - M I BRAHMBHATT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: RCA No. 30/2022 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment, declaring that the respondents (legal heirs of Vijiben) hold a 1/2 share in the disputed agricultural property as undivided ancestral property. The court rejected defendants' claims that respondents had relinquished their rights, finding unregistered relinquishment documents inadmissible under the Registration Act. The judgment upheld respondents' inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Amendment Act, 2005. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
9th Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
9th Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgement
9th Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Final Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Hearing
10th Addl District Judge
-
03-May-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Mar-2025
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
For R&P
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
For R&P
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
For R&P
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
For R&P
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-May-2024
For R&P
6th Addl District Judge
-
22-Feb-2024
For R&P
6th Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2023
For R&P
6th Addl District Judge
-
08-Sep-2023
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jun-2023
Service Of Process
6th Addl District Judge
-
31-Mar-2023
Service Of Process
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Jan-2023
Service Of Process
6th Addl District Judge
-
29-Nov-2022
Service Of Process
6th Addl District Judge
-
12-Sep-2022
Service Of Process
6th Addl District Judge
-
14-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2022
Case Summary: RCA No. 30/2022 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment, declaring that the respondents (legal heirs of Vijiben) hold a 1/2 share in the disputed agricultural property as undivided ancestral property. The court rejected defendants' claims that respondents had relinquished their rights, finding unregistered relinquishment documents inadmissible under the Registration Act. The judgment upheld respondents' inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Amendment Act, 2005. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts