VIBHABEN @ CHETANKUMAR PATEL vs SHIVABHAI MASHRUBHAI BHARWAD Advocate - EX PARTY — 334/2017
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJAH010018662017
Filing Number
334/2017
Filing Date
24-Mar-2017
Registration No
334/2017
Registration Date
24-Mar-2017
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
4-9th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIBHABEN @ CHETANKUMAR PATEL
Adv. B S SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVABHAI MASHRUBHAI BHARWAD Advocate - EX PARTY
-
2.HARENDRASINH BALVANTSINH ZALA
-
3.THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD
Adv. A.O.CHUDGAR
-
4.MAHENDRASINH HUKUMSINH VAGHELA
Adv. k.b.parmar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: MACP No. 334/2017 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partially allowed the claim and awarded Rs. 44,86,328 compensation to the legal heirs of deceased Chetankumar Bhikhabhai Patel, who died in a July 2016 motor accident. The tribunal held both vehicle drivers 50%-50% negligent for composite negligence and made all defendants (truck owner, driver, and insurer) jointly and severally liable. Key Reasoning: The court found the truck driver suddenly applied brakes causing deviation, but the car driver failed to maintain safe distance per Road Regulations—both contributed equally. Since passengers cannot bear contributory negligence, the claimants received full compensation based on the deceased's Rs. 2,87,365 annual income (2014-15 tax return), applying a multiplier of 16 years and 40% prospective income increase for self-employment, with 9% interest from petition date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
9th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
9th Addl District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Judgement
9th Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
9th Addl District Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Opponents Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Opponents Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Applicants Evidence
10th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-May-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-May-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Jan-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Summons - Notice
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jun-2024
Summons - Notice
4th Addl District Judge
-
04-Apr-2024
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
14-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
28-Dec-2023
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
09-Nov-2023
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
13-Sep-2023
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
03-Aug-2023
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
04-May-2023
Summons - Notice
8th Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2023
Summons - Notice
8th Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2023
Summons - Notice
8th Addl District Judge
-
24-Jan-2023
Summons - Notice
8th Addl District Judge
-
28-Nov-2022
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
11-Oct-2022
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
10-Aug-2022
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jul-2022
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
12-Apr-2022
Summons - Notice
7th Addl District Judge
-
20-Jan-2022
Summons - Notice
7th Addl District Judge
-
29-Nov-2021
Summons - Notice
7th Addl District Judge
-
24-Aug-2021
Summons - Notice
8th Addl District Judge
-
19-Jun-2021
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2021
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
04-Feb-2021
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
05-Nov-2020
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
24-Sep-2020
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jul-2020
Summons - Notice
10th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jun-2020
Summons - Notice
12th Addl District Judge
-
02-May-2020
Summons - Notice
12th Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2020
Summons - Notice
12th Addl District Judge
-
10-Feb-2020
Summons - Notice
12th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jan-2020
Summons - Notice
12th Addl District Judge
-
17-Dec-2019
Summons - Notice
12th Addl District Judge
-
18-Nov-2019
Summons - Notice
12th Addl District Judge
-
07-Sep-2019
Written Statement/Reply
7th Addl District Judge
-
13-Jul-2019
Written Statement
7th Addl District Judge
-
27-Mar-2019
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2019
Summons - Notice
9th Addl District Judge
-
18-Jan-2019
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
10-Oct-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jun-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
23-Feb-2018
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
29-Nov-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
07-Sep-2017
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
06-May-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 334/2017
Case Summary: MACP No. 334/2017 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partially allowed the claim and awarded Rs. 44,86,328 compensation to the legal heirs of deceased Chetankumar Bhikhabhai Patel, who died in a July 2016 motor accident. The tribunal held both vehicle drivers 50%-50% negligent for composite negligence and made all defendants (truck owner, driver, and insurer) jointly and severally liable. Key Reasoning: The court found the truck driver suddenly applied brakes causing deviation, but the car driver failed to maintain safe distance per Road Regulations—both contributed equally. Since passengers cannot bear contributory negligence, the claimants received full compensation based on the deceased's Rs. 2,87,365 annual income (2014-15 tax return), applying a multiplier of 16 years and 40% prospective income increase for self-employment, with 9% interest from petition date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts