VANRAJBHAI BHIMJIBHAI GANGADIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 723/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010018502026

Case disposed

Filing Number

723/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

723/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192018230091

Police Station

DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 395,332,186,504,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

VANRAJBHAI BHIMJIBHAI GANGADIYA

Adv. A M GAMARA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad granted regular bail to Vanrajbhai Bhimjibhai Gangadiya, accused in a gang attack on electricity company employees (FIR under IPC sections 395, 332, 186, 504, 506(2)). The court applied the parity principle, noting that all major co-accused had been released on bail and the applicant's role was substantially similar, warranting equal treatment. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and maintaining contact with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad granted regular bail to Vanrajbhai Bhimjibhai Gangadiya, accused in a gang attack on electricity company employees (FIR under IPC sections 395, 332, 186, 504, 506(2)). The court applied the parity principle, noting that all major co-accused had been released on bail and the applicant's role was substantially similar, warranting equal treatment. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and maintaining contact with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case