VANRAJBHAI BHIMJIBHAI GANGADIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 723/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010018502026
Filing Number
723/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
723/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
5-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192018230091
Police Station
DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VANRAJBHAI BHIMJIBHAI GANGADIYA
Adv. A M GAMARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad granted regular bail to Vanrajbhai Bhimjibhai Gangadiya, accused in a gang attack on electricity company employees (FIR under IPC sections 395, 332, 186, 504, 506(2)). The court applied the parity principle, noting that all major co-accused had been released on bail and the applicant's role was substantially similar, warranting equal treatment. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and maintaining contact with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 723/2026
The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad granted regular bail to Vanrajbhai Bhimjibhai Gangadiya, accused in a gang attack on electricity company employees (FIR under IPC sections 395, 332, 186, 504, 506(2)). The court applied the parity principle, noting that all major co-accused had been released on bail and the applicant's role was substantially similar, warranting equal treatment. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and maintaining contact with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts