VIKASSINH SON OF HOSILA PRASADSINH RAJPUT vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 722/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010018482026

Case disposed

Filing Number

722/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

722/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

ASLALI POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 364(A),365,385,387,120(B)

Petitioner(s)

VIKASSINH SON OF HOSILA PRASADSINH RAJPUT

Adv. M R VAIDHYA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

01-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

ORDER

27-03-2026

ORDER

25-03-2026

ORDER

24-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court granted regular bail to Vikassinh S/o. Hosila Prasadsinh Rajput, accused in a 2016 kidnapping case (FIR No. I-70/2016) under sections 364A, 365, 385, 387, 114, and 120(B) IPC. Despite the prosecution arguing he had absconded since 2016 and posed flight risk due to his Uttar Pradesh residence, the judge allowed bail based on the principle of parity, noting all major co-accused had been granted bail by the High Court. Release conditions include a Rs.50,000 personal bond with surety, disclosure of residential address, regular court attendance, and prohibition from criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to Vikassinh S/o. Hosila Prasadsinh Rajput, accused in a 2016 kidnapping case (FIR No. I-70/2016) under sections 364A, 365, 385, 387, 114, and 120(B) IPC. Despite the prosecution arguing he had absconded since 2016 and posed flight risk due to his Uttar Pradesh residence, the judge allowed bail based on the principle of parity, noting all major co-accused had been granted bail by the High Court. Release conditions include a Rs.50,000 personal bond with surety, disclosure of residential address, regular court attendance, and prohibition from criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case