RAHULBHAI SON OF GOVINDBHAI SHRAVANBHAI GOHEL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 721/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010018472026
Filing Number
721/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
721/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192065250006
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAHULBHAI SON OF GOVINDBHAI SHRAVANBHAI GOHEL
Adv. D M CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMA 721/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Rahulbhai Gohel was rejected. The 4th Additional Sessions Judge found a prima facie case against him in a large-scale cyber fraud scheme involving Rs. 83.5 lakh, where he facilitated bank account access, provided transaction kits, and personally withdrew Rs. 4.75 lakh in proceeds. The court noted his involvement with co-accused Axay Jambuja and cited his status as a habitual offender with another similar case pending against him as grounds for denying bail despite the charge-sheet being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMA 721/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Rahulbhai Gohel was rejected. The 4th Additional Sessions Judge found a prima facie case against him in a large-scale cyber fraud scheme involving Rs. 83.5 lakh, where he facilitated bank account access, provided transaction kits, and personally withdrew Rs. 4.75 lakh in proceeds. The court noted his involvement with co-accused Axay Jambuja and cited his status as a habitual offender with another similar case pending against him as grounds for denying bail despite the charge-sheet being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts