ARYAN ALIAS LAKHAN SON OF SHOBHRAJBHAI JOSHETA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 720/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010018462026
Filing Number
720/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
720/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192065250006
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARYAN ALIAS LAKHAN SON OF SHOBHRAJBHAI JOSHETA
Adv. D M CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 720/2026 The court rejected Aryan's bail application in a cyber-fraud case involving Rs. 83.5 lakh investment scam. Aryan was accused of participating in a stock market investment fraud scheme where victims were lured via social media and issued fabricated SEBI letters; he withdrew Rs. 13.28 lakh from co-accused's bank account. The court found a prima facie case against him based on bank withdrawals yet unrecovered, two similar pending criminal cases indicating habitual offending, and ongoing investigation with co-accused still absconding, despite the charge-sheet being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 720/2026 The court rejected Aryan's bail application in a cyber-fraud case involving Rs. 83.5 lakh investment scam. Aryan was accused of participating in a stock market investment fraud scheme where victims were lured via social media and issued fabricated SEBI letters; he withdrew Rs. 13.28 lakh from co-accused's bank account. The court found a prima facie case against him based on bank withdrawals yet unrecovered, two similar pending criminal cases indicating habitual offending, and ongoing investigation with co-accused still absconding, despite the charge-sheet being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts