RAMESHBHAI ALIAS RANCHHO BAVAJI KESHAVBHAI SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 715/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010018192026

Filing Number

715/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

715/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

4-9th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191044250349

Police Station

GHATLODIA POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 109(1),115(2),296(B),61,189(2),189(4),191(2),191(3),190

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI ALIAS RANCHHO BAVAJI KESHAVBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. H M MADHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail petition of Rameshbhai (alias Ranchho) Bavaji Keshavbhai Solanki in a case involving charges under IPC Section 143 for obtaining regular land. The court found that the accused's role was distinctly more serious than co-accused who were already granted bail—he held a knife to the victim's eye, struck with a rod, and caused injuries—and therefore parity principles did not require granting him bail. The court denied the petition, finding the severity of allegations, the accused's direct involvement in violence, and the need to prevent witness tampering outweighed bail considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    9th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 715/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail petition of Rameshbhai (alias Ranchho) Bavaji Keshavbhai Solanki in a case involving charges under IPC Section 143 for obtaining regular land. The court found that the accused's role was distinctly more serious than co-accused who were already granted bail—he held a knife to the victim's eye, struck with a rod, and caused injuries—and therefore parity principles did not require granting him bail. The court denied the petition, finding the severity of allegations, the accused's direct involvement in violence, and the need to prevent witness tampering outweighed bail considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case