RAMESHBHAI ALIAS RANCHHO BAVAJI KESHAVBHAI SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 715/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010018192026
Filing Number
715/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
715/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
4-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191044250349
Police Station
GHATLODIA POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESHBHAI ALIAS RANCHHO BAVAJI KESHAVBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. H M MADHU
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the bail petition of Rameshbhai (alias Ranchho) Bavaji Keshavbhai Solanki in a case involving charges under IPC Section 143 for obtaining regular land. The court found that the accused's role was distinctly more serious than co-accused who were already granted bail—he held a knife to the victim's eye, struck with a rod, and caused injuries—and therefore parity principles did not require granting him bail. The court denied the petition, finding the severity of allegations, the accused's direct involvement in violence, and the need to prevent witness tampering outweighed bail considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the bail petition of Rameshbhai (alias Ranchho) Bavaji Keshavbhai Solanki in a case involving charges under IPC Section 143 for obtaining regular land. The court found that the accused's role was distinctly more serious than co-accused who were already granted bail—he held a knife to the victim's eye, struck with a rod, and caused injuries—and therefore parity principles did not require granting him bail. The court denied the petition, finding the severity of allegations, the accused's direct involvement in violence, and the need to prevent witness tampering outweighed bail considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts