SANJAY ALIAS CHADDI LAXMANBHAI THAKOR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 700/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010017862026

Filing Number

700/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

700/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

5-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191002250060

Police Station

RANIP POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 103(1),117(2),137(2),109,351(2),54,189(2),191(3),190
Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Trocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(2)(5),3(2)(5-A),3(1)(S)
Bombay Police (Gujarat Amendment and Validation) Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY ALIAS CHADDI LAXMANBHAI THAKOR

    Adv. H S PARMAR

  2. 2.BHARAT ALIAS BIBLI BABUJI THAKOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

  2. 2.ORIGINAL COMPLAINANT

    Adv. P A VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 700/2026 The court granted regular bail to two accused (Sanjay and Bharat Thakor) charged with serious offences including criminal intimidation and atrocity crimes. Though previous bail applications were rejected, the court found a substantial change in circumstances: the investigating officer admitted providing arrest grounds only orally, violating mandatory written notification requirements under BNSS Sections 47-48, as established in *Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra*. The court held that procedural illegality affecting constitutional rights cannot be disregarded on technical grounds, and released both accused on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  10. 20-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  11. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  13. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  14. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  15. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 700/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 700/2026 The court granted regular bail to two accused (Sanjay and Bharat Thakor) charged with serious offences including criminal intimidation and atrocity crimes. Though previous bail applications were rejected, the court found a substantial change in circumstances: the investigating officer admitted providing arrest grounds only orally, violating mandatory written notification requirements under BNSS Sections 47-48, as established in *Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra*. The court held that procedural illegality affecting constitutional rights cannot be disregarded on technical grounds, and released both accused on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case