SIDDHARTH SON OF BHUPENDRA RAVAL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 686/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010017592026

Case disposed

Filing Number

686/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

686/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191042250328

Police Station

SATELLITE POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
GUJARAT PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS (IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS) ACT, 2003 Section 3
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 318(2),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

SIDDHARTH SON OF BHUPENDRA RAVAL

Adv. D S GADHVI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

ORDER

11-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court granted bail to Siddharth S/o Bhupendra Raval, accused of criminal breach of trust and fraud involving ₹40 lakh investments, primarily because his arrest was illegal. The court found that the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours as mandated by Article 22(2) of the Constitution—he was produced at 16:55 hours on 07/03/2026 instead of by 12:00 hours, violating fundamental rights. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court released him on bail with stringent conditions including monthly police station reporting and passport surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to Siddharth S/o Bhupendra Raval, accused of criminal breach of trust and fraud involving ₹40 lakh investments, primarily because his arrest was illegal. The court found that the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours as mandated by Article 22(2) of the Constitution—he was produced at 16:55 hours on 07/03/2026 instead of by 12:00 hours, violating fundamental rights. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court released him on bail with stringent conditions including monthly police station reporting and passport surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case