SURAJ SON OF MUKESH GATULAL DAMOR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 680/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010015942026

Case disposed

Filing Number

680/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

680/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191045260084

Police Station

SOLA HIGH COURT POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 109,118(2),118(1),115(2),296(B),125(A),54

Petitioner(s)

SURAJ SON OF MUKESH GATULAL DAMOR

Adv. R K ROT

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Case 680/2026 Petitioner: Suraj son of Mukesh Gatulal Damor Respondent: The State of Gujarat Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's bail application. The petitioner was arrested under BNS sections 109, 118(2), 118(1), 119(2), 296(b), 129(a), and 103(1) for allegedly participating in a fatal assault. The court found that the petitioner, along with other co-accused, fatally attacked the victim using a wooden stick and stone, causing injuries resulting in death. Despite the petitioner's claims of minimal involvement, the court determined he played an active role in the crime, particularly considering the case's serious nature and that investigation was still in preliminary stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 680/2026 Petitioner: Suraj son of Mukesh Gatulal Damor Respondent: The State of Gujarat Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's bail application. The petitioner was arrested under BNS sections 109, 118(2), 118(1), 119(2), 296(b), 129(a), and 103(1) for allegedly participating in a fatal assault. The court found that the petitioner, along with other co-accused, fatally attacked the victim using a wooden stick and stone, causing injuries resulting in death. Despite the petitioner's claims of minimal involvement, the court determined he played an active role in the crime, particularly considering the case's serious nature and that investigation was still in preliminary stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case