SURAJ SON OF MUKESH GATULAL DAMOR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 680/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010015942026
Filing Number
680/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
680/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191045260084
Police Station
SOLA HIGH COURT POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURAJ SON OF MUKESH GATULAL DAMOR
Adv. R K ROT
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 680/2026 Petitioner: Suraj son of Mukesh Gatulal Damor Respondent: The State of Gujarat Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's bail application. The petitioner was arrested under BNS sections 109, 118(2), 118(1), 119(2), 296(b), 129(a), and 103(1) for allegedly participating in a fatal assault. The court found that the petitioner, along with other co-accused, fatally attacked the victim using a wooden stick and stone, causing injuries resulting in death. Despite the petitioner's claims of minimal involvement, the court determined he played an active role in the crime, particularly considering the case's serious nature and that investigation was still in preliminary stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 680/2026 Petitioner: Suraj son of Mukesh Gatulal Damor Respondent: The State of Gujarat Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's bail application. The petitioner was arrested under BNS sections 109, 118(2), 118(1), 119(2), 296(b), 129(a), and 103(1) for allegedly participating in a fatal assault. The court found that the petitioner, along with other co-accused, fatally attacked the victim using a wooden stick and stone, causing injuries resulting in death. Despite the petitioner's claims of minimal involvement, the court determined he played an active role in the crime, particularly considering the case's serious nature and that investigation was still in preliminary stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts