PATEL MANISHKUMAR MANUBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 675/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010015832026

Filing Number

675/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

675/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

ATS POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 336(2),337,338,339,341(2)(4),54,61(1)(A,B)(2)(A)
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(A),27,29,30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL MANISHKUMAR MANUBHAI

    Adv. R B PAREKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 675/2026 The court allowed Patel Manishkumar Manubhai's application to temporarily travel outside Gujarat to Bhuvaneshwar for pilgrimage from 19-22 March 2026, relaxing bail condition 2b imposed in his earlier bail order. The court noted the applicant had not breached any bail conditions, the prosecution raised no objections, the travel was limited to four days only, and the applicant produced return air tickets, making the temporary modification justified in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 675/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 675/2026 The court allowed Patel Manishkumar Manubhai's application to temporarily travel outside Gujarat to Bhuvaneshwar for pilgrimage from 19-22 March 2026, relaxing bail condition 2b imposed in his earlier bail order. The court noted the applicant had not breached any bail conditions, the prosecution raised no objections, the travel was limited to four days only, and the applicant produced return air tickets, making the temporary modification justified in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case