RAJENDRA NATWERLAL PATEL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - A K JADEJA — 673/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010015552026

Case disposed

Filing Number

673/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

673/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191048212227

Police Station

SARKHEJ POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483(1)B
THE GUJARAT LAND GRABBING (PROHIBITION) ACT, 2020 Section 3,4(1),4(2),4(3),5(A),5(B),5(C),5(E)

Petitioner(s)

RAJENDRA NATWERLAL PATEL

Adv. A B CHOKSHI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - A K JADEJA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
ORDER

The court allowed the application of Rajendra Natwerlal Patel, accused under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, to temporarily suspend bail conditions and release his passport for travel to Male, Maldives from March 23 to April 11, 2026. The court granted this relief based on the principle of presumption of innocence, the applicant's prior compliance with bail conditions, and absence of any evidence of breach, while imposing conditions including deposit of Rs. 50,000, provision of detailed travel itinerary, and undertaking to appear for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application of Rajendra Natwerlal Patel, accused under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, to temporarily suspend bail conditions and release his passport for travel to Male, Maldives from March 23 to April 11, 2026. The court granted this relief based on the principle of presumption of innocence, the applicant's prior compliance with bail conditions, and absence of any evidence of breach, while imposing conditions including deposit of Rs. 50,000, provision of detailed travel itinerary, and undertaking to appear for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case