JHILUBHA CHELUBHA SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - B N LIMBACHIA — 668/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010015452026
Filing Number
668/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
668/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191066250194
Police Station
VASNA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JHILUBHA CHELUBHA SOLANKI
Adv. R R SHAH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - B N LIMBACHIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 668/2026 - Jhilubha Chelubha Solanki v. The State of Gujarat The court granted regular bail to 21-year-old Jhilubha Chelubha Solanki after chargesheet, finding that while he faced serious charges including attempt to murder and organized crime offenses arising from a September 2025 assault incident, the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime (GujCTOC) Act provisions did not prima facie apply to his specific case. The court found his alleged involvement in three separate incidents appeared more like isolated quarrels rather than systematic organized crime syndicate membership. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, monthly police station check-ins, confinement outside Ahmedabad city, travel restrictions, and witness non-tampering provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 668/2026 - Jhilubha Chelubha Solanki v. The State of Gujarat The court granted regular bail to 21-year-old Jhilubha Chelubha Solanki after chargesheet, finding that while he faced serious charges including attempt to murder and organized crime offenses arising from a September 2025 assault incident, the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime (GujCTOC) Act provisions did not prima facie apply to his specific case. The court found his alleged involvement in three separate incidents appeared more like isolated quarrels rather than systematic organized crime syndicate membership. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, monthly police station check-ins, confinement outside Ahmedabad city, travel restrictions, and witness non-tampering provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts