SURESHBHAI AMULAKHBHAI SHAH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 663/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010015382026
Filing Number
663/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
663/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
2-10th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESHBHAI AMULAKHBHAI SHAH
Adv. R D RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Sureshbhai Amulakhbhai Shah v. State of Gujarat (Cr.M.A. 663/2026) The 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad rejected Sureshbhai Amulakhbhai Shah's anticipatory bail application filed in connection with allegations of cheating and embezzlement of funds from Riddhi Siddhi Credit Society. The court found no imminent threat of arrest since no FIR had been registered and the police investigation was still ongoing, with no exceptional circumstances demonstrated by the applicant to warrant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
10th Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
10th Addl District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
10th Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
10th Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
10th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
10th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 663/2026
Case Summary: Sureshbhai Amulakhbhai Shah v. State of Gujarat (Cr.M.A. 663/2026) The 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad rejected Sureshbhai Amulakhbhai Shah's anticipatory bail application filed in connection with allegations of cheating and embezzlement of funds from Riddhi Siddhi Credit Society. The court found no imminent threat of arrest since no FIR had been registered and the police investigation was still ongoing, with no exceptional circumstances demonstrated by the applicant to warrant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts