SURESHBHAI AMULAKHBHAI SHAH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 663/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010015382026

Case disposed

Filing Number

663/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

663/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

2-10th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

SURESHBHAI AMULAKHBHAI SHAH

Adv. R D RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-10th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

27-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

ORDER

23-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

20-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

18-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Sureshbhai Amulakhbhai Shah v. State of Gujarat (Cr.M.A. 663/2026) The 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad rejected Sureshbhai Amulakhbhai Shah's anticipatory bail application filed in connection with allegations of cheating and embezzlement of funds from Riddhi Siddhi Credit Society. The court found no imminent threat of arrest since no FIR had been registered and the police investigation was still ongoing, with no exceptional circumstances demonstrated by the applicant to warrant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sureshbhai Amulakhbhai Shah v. State of Gujarat (Cr.M.A. 663/2026) The 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad rejected Sureshbhai Amulakhbhai Shah's anticipatory bail application filed in connection with allegations of cheating and embezzlement of funds from Riddhi Siddhi Credit Society. The court found no imminent threat of arrest since no FIR had been registered and the police investigation was still ongoing, with no exceptional circumstances demonstrated by the applicant to warrant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case