MAHESHBHAI VALLABHBHAI GAJERA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 658/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010015172026
Filing Number
658/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
658/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192011240054
Police Station
BOPAL POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESHBHAI VALLABHBHAI GAJERA
Adv. S I MARU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Ahmedabad High Court (CRMA No. 658/2026) granted bail to the accused with conditions including deposit of ₹50,000, surrender of passport to the investigating officer, and permission to travel abroad for a family visit to Japan from March 29 to May 18, 2025, provided the visa is obtained within the specified timeframe. The court imposed strict conditions: the accused must return within the deadline, maintain regular police station reporting, and cooperate with ongoing investigations into serious charges under IPC sections 465, 467-468, 471, and 120B. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 658/2026
Court Decision Summary The Ahmedabad High Court (CRMA No. 658/2026) granted bail to the accused with conditions including deposit of ₹50,000, surrender of passport to the investigating officer, and permission to travel abroad for a family visit to Japan from March 29 to May 18, 2025, provided the visa is obtained within the specified timeframe. The court imposed strict conditions: the accused must return within the deadline, maintain regular police station reporting, and cooperate with ongoing investigations into serious charges under IPC sections 465, 467-468, 471, and 120B. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts