IMRAN ALIAS VANKO ALIAS LANGADO ALIAS BIDI AMINBHAI KADODIYA JAMADAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 657/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010015162026
Filing Number
657/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
657/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192019250294
Police Station
DHOLERA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
IMRAN ALIAS VANKO ALIAS LANGADO ALIAS BIDI AMINBHAI KADODIYA JAMADAR
Adv. S P GAMARA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Ahmedabad Sessions Court granted regular bail to the accused Imran Uref Wanko and others in a criminal case under IPC Section 310(2), 311, and 135. The court found that while the accused were involved in serious allegations of robbery and extortion, the investigation was substantially complete, and releasing them on bail with specified conditions—including a personal bond of ₹10,000, reporting to the police station, and restrictions on leaving India—would not prejudice the trial or endanger the victim-witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Ahmedabad Sessions Court granted regular bail to the accused Imran Uref Wanko and others in a criminal case under IPC Section 310(2), 311, and 135. The court found that while the accused were involved in serious allegations of robbery and extortion, the investigation was substantially complete, and releasing them on bail with specified conditions—including a personal bond of ₹10,000, reporting to the police station, and restrictions on leaving India—would not prejudice the trial or endanger the victim-witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts