HITESH POPATJI THAKOR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 653/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010015102026
Filing Number
653/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
653/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191048250910
Police Station
SARKHEJ POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HITESH POPATJI THAKOR
Adv. H M PUJARA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CR.M.A. No. 653/2026 The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) rejected the bail application of 19-year-old Hitesh Popatji Thakor, who is charged with murder, kidnapping, and related offences in connection with the death of a 15-year-old girl. The court found prima facie evidence that Thakor held the victim while his co-accused inflicted fatal injuries, after which they disposed of her body in a canal; call records and mobile tower location data placed him at the crime scene, and the severity of the charges (carrying life imprisonment or death penalty) weighed against bail eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CR.M.A. No. 653/2026 The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) rejected the bail application of 19-year-old Hitesh Popatji Thakor, who is charged with murder, kidnapping, and related offences in connection with the death of a 15-year-old girl. The court found prima facie evidence that Thakor held the victim while his co-accused inflicted fatal injuries, after which they disposed of her body in a canal; call records and mobile tower location data placed him at the crime scene, and the severity of the charges (carrying life imprisonment or death penalty) weighed against bail eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts