KASHMIRABEN SURESHBHAI SHAH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 649/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010015052026
Filing Number
649/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
649/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
2-10th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KASHMIRABEN SURESHBHAI SHAH
Adv. R D RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.M.A. No. 649/2026 Decision: The court rejected Kashmiraben Sureshbhai Shah's anticipatory bail application. The judge found no imminent threat of arrest since no FIR had been registered and the applicant had not cooperated with police investigation, determining no exceptional circumstances warranted bail at that stage. Key Reasoning: The court noted the investigation was ongoing regarding allegations of embezzlement in the Riddhi Siddhi Credit Society. Following Supreme Court precedent (*Vijaykumar Gopichand Ramchandani*), the court declined to issue directions requiring police to give advance notice before arrest, as such directions are legally impermissible in cognizable offence cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
10th Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
10th Addl District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
10th Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
10th Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
10th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
10th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 649/2026
Case Summary: Cr.M.A. No. 649/2026 Decision: The court rejected Kashmiraben Sureshbhai Shah's anticipatory bail application. The judge found no imminent threat of arrest since no FIR had been registered and the applicant had not cooperated with police investigation, determining no exceptional circumstances warranted bail at that stage. Key Reasoning: The court noted the investigation was ongoing regarding allegations of embezzlement in the Riddhi Siddhi Credit Society. Following Supreme Court precedent (*Vijaykumar Gopichand Ramchandani*), the court declined to issue directions requiring police to give advance notice before arrest, as such directions are legally impermissible in cognizable offence cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts