MAHESHBHAI ALIAS SETYO SON OF MELUBHAI PASHABHAI VAGHELA KO.PATEL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 641/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010014962026
Filing Number
641/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
641/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192003250294
Police Station
Sanand GIDC Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESHBHAI ALIAS SETYO SON OF MELUBHAI PASHABHAI VAGHELA KO.PATEL
Adv. M R VAIDHYA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In CRMA No.641-2026, the High Court of Gujarat dismissed the applicant's petition seeking bail and release of land from a criminal case involving serious charges under IPC Sections 103(1), 115(2), and JPC Section 135. The court found that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient grounds for bail, particularly given the death of the co-accused (brother) on 28/02/2025, the ongoing criminal proceedings, and the gravity of the accusations, determining that releasing the land would not serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In CRMA No.641-2026, the High Court of Gujarat dismissed the applicant's petition seeking bail and release of land from a criminal case involving serious charges under IPC Sections 103(1), 115(2), and JPC Section 135. The court found that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient grounds for bail, particularly given the death of the co-accused (brother) on 28/02/2025, the ongoing criminal proceedings, and the gravity of the accusations, determining that releasing the land would not serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts