MAHESHBHAI ALIAS SETYO SON OF MELUBHAI PASHABHAI VAGHELA KO.PATEL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 641/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010014962026
Filing Number
641/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
641/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192003250294
Police Station
Sanand GIDC Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESHBHAI ALIAS SETYO SON OF MELUBHAI PASHABHAI VAGHELA KO.PATEL
Adv. M R VAIDHYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary In CRMA No.641-2026, the High Court of Gujarat dismissed the applicant's petition seeking bail and release of land from a criminal case involving serious charges under IPC Sections 103(1), 115(2), and JPC Section 135. The court found that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient grounds for bail, particularly given the death of the co-accused (brother) on 28/02/2025, the ongoing criminal proceedings, and the gravity of the accusations, determining that releasing the land would not serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 641/2026
Summary In CRMA No.641-2026, the High Court of Gujarat dismissed the applicant's petition seeking bail and release of land from a criminal case involving serious charges under IPC Sections 103(1), 115(2), and JPC Section 135. The court found that the applicant had failed to provide sufficient grounds for bail, particularly given the death of the co-accused (brother) on 28/02/2025, the ongoing criminal proceedings, and the gravity of the accusations, determining that releasing the land would not serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts