SNEHAL WIFE OF ANILBHAI PREMBHAI RATHVA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 636/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010014902026

Case disposed

Filing Number

636/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

636/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191028240365

Police Station

VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302,450,114,120(B)
BOMBAY POLICE (GUJARAT AMENDMENT AND VALIDATION) ACT Section 135(1)
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(2)(5),3(2)(5-A)

Petitioner(s)

SNEHAL WIFE OF ANILBHAI PREMBHAI RATHVA

Adv. A I DUDHWALA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

ORIGINAL COMPLAINANT

Hearing History

Judge: 5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

ORDER

16-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

ORDER

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court granted regular bail to Snehal Rathwa, a 22-year-old accused of conspiring to murder her husband, finding that she was not directly involved in the actual killing and was entitled to parity with her co-accused who had already been bailed. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 50,000 personal bond and surety, court attendance, residence reporting, and a prohibition on leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to Snehal Rathwa, a 22-year-old accused of conspiring to murder her husband, finding that she was not directly involved in the actual killing and was entitled to parity with her co-accused who had already been bailed. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 50,000 personal bond and surety, court attendance, residence reporting, and a prohibition on leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case