LAKUM KARTIK RATILAL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 55/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJAH010014572026

Case disposed

Filing Number

55/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192018250607

Police Station

DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 438
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 111(2)B,111(3)(4)
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A),65(E),81,83,98(2),116(B)

Petitioner(s)

LAKUM KARTIK RATILAL

Adv. U I PATEL

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

24-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Revision 55/2026 Lakum Kartik Ratilal's revision petition challenging the trial court's denial of his application for return of a seized vehicle was dismissed. The court upheld the lower court's order rejecting the bail application, finding that the vehicle—containing 20 liters of illicit liquor—was properly seized under the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949, Section 98(2), which mandates government custody of contraband regardless of vehicle ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Revision 55/2026 Lakum Kartik Ratilal's revision petition challenging the trial court's denial of his application for return of a seized vehicle was dismissed. The court upheld the lower court's order rejecting the bail application, finding that the vehicle—containing 20 liters of illicit liquor—was properly seized under the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949, Section 98(2), which mandates government custody of contraband regardless of vehicle ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case