MAHESHGIRI PRAKASHGIRI GOSWAMI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 616/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010014352026
Filing Number
616/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
616/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191015260004
Police Station
Nikol Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESHGIRI PRAKASHGIRI GOSWAMI
Adv. K H MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
ORIGINAL COMPLAINANT
Hearing History
Judge: 5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Maheshgiri Prakashgiri Goswami, who was charged under Section 296(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant abused the complainant and family members, and held that anticipatory bail in atrocity cases can only be granted when no case is made out on the FIR's face, which was not satisfied here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Maheshgiri Prakashgiri Goswami, who was charged under Section 296(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant abused the complainant and family members, and held that anticipatory bail in atrocity cases can only be granted when no case is made out on the FIR's face, which was not satisfied here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts