MAHESHGIRI PRAKASHGIRI GOSWAMI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 616/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010014352026
Filing Number
616/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
616/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
5-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191015260004
Police Station
Nikol Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESHGIRI PRAKASHGIRI GOSWAMI
Adv. K H MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
-
2.ORIGINAL COMPLAINANT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Maheshgiri Prakashgiri Goswami, who was charged under Section 296(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant abused the complainant and family members, and held that anticipatory bail in atrocity cases can only be granted when no case is made out on the FIR's face, which was not satisfied here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 616/2026
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Maheshgiri Prakashgiri Goswami, who was charged under Section 296(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant abused the complainant and family members, and held that anticipatory bail in atrocity cases can only be granted when no case is made out on the FIR's face, which was not satisfied here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts