ABHISHEK MUKESH LOHAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 52/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJAH010014332026
Filing Number
52/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
52/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191006250238
Police Station
BODAKDEV POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABHISHEK MUKESH LOHAR
Adv. M M SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 52/2026 Abhishek Mukesh Lohar v. The State of Gujarat Petitioner Abhishek Mukesh Lohar sought revision of the trial court's order denying return of his seized Maruti Suzuki vehicle (Registration: RJ-30 CB-7865) under Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The vehicle was seized during a prohibition law enforcement operation at Bodkdev Police Station based on allegations under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 98(2), after allegedly finding 20+ liters of liquor inside. The revision court dismissed the petition, upholding the trial court's order. The court held that under Section 98(2) of the Prohibition Act 1949, no court has authority to release seized contraband materials pending trial proceedings, notwithstanding the petitioner's ownership claim and argument that the vehicle was not used for illegal purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 52/2026 Abhishek Mukesh Lohar v. The State of Gujarat Petitioner Abhishek Mukesh Lohar sought revision of the trial court's order denying return of his seized Maruti Suzuki vehicle (Registration: RJ-30 CB-7865) under Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The vehicle was seized during a prohibition law enforcement operation at Bodkdev Police Station based on allegations under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 98(2), after allegedly finding 20+ liters of liquor inside. The revision court dismissed the petition, upholding the trial court's order. The court held that under Section 98(2) of the Prohibition Act 1949, no court has authority to release seized contraband materials pending trial proceedings, notwithstanding the petitioner's ownership claim and argument that the vehicle was not used for illegal purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts