RAGHUBHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL vs NARESH DALPATBHAI MALHOTRA Advocate - N Y SHUKLA — 46/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd April 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJAH010013052026
Filing Number
46/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
2-10th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAGHUBHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL
Adv. B P BHATT
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARESH DALPATBHAI MALHOTRA Advocate - N Y SHUKLA
-
2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Raghubhai Shankarbhai Patel v. Naresh Dalpatbhai Malhotra The 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad dismissed the criminal revision application challenging an interim compensation order under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court ordered the accused to pay 20% of a ₹50 lakh dishonored cheque amount as interim compensation to the complainant. The court upheld the order, finding prima facie evidence of a transaction involving the accused's investment scheme and property agreements, determining the accused signed the cheque in individual capacity despite partnership involvement, and rejecting arguments that no reasoned order was passed or defenses were ignored. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
10th Addl District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgement
10th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
10th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2026
Case Summary: Raghubhai Shankarbhai Patel v. Naresh Dalpatbhai Malhotra The 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad dismissed the criminal revision application challenging an interim compensation order under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court ordered the accused to pay 20% of a ₹50 lakh dishonored cheque amount as interim compensation to the complainant. The court upheld the order, finding prima facie evidence of a transaction involving the accused's investment scheme and property agreements, determining the accused signed the cheque in individual capacity despite partnership involvement, and rejecting arguments that no reasoned order was passed or defenses were ignored. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts