RAGHUBHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL vs NARESH DALPATBHAI MALHOTRA Advocate - N Y SHUKLA — 42/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd April 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJAH010012972026
Filing Number
42/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
2-10th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAGHUBHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL
Adv. B P BHATT
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARESH DALPATBHAI MALHOTRA Advocate - N Y SHUKLA
-
2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) dismissed the criminal revision application filed by accused Raghubhai Patel challenging the trial court's order granting 20% interim compensation (₹20 lakh) under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act to complainant Naresh Malhotra in a cheque dishonor case. The court upheld the trial court's order, finding that the complainant established a prima facie case after investing ₹6.25 crore in the accused's scheme, executing property agreements later breached when the accused sold those properties to third parties, and that the accused had not demonstrated dilatory tactics justifying denial of interim compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
10th Addl District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgement
10th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
10th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2026
Case Summary The 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) dismissed the criminal revision application filed by accused Raghubhai Patel challenging the trial court's order granting 20% interim compensation (₹20 lakh) under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act to complainant Naresh Malhotra in a cheque dishonor case. The court upheld the trial court's order, finding that the complainant established a prima facie case after investing ₹6.25 crore in the accused's scheme, executing property agreements later breached when the accused sold those properties to third parties, and that the accused had not demonstrated dilatory tactics justifying denial of interim compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts