CHAUDHRY DINESH AMBALAL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 41/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJAH010012902026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

3-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191015220953

Police Station

Nikol Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),65(E),81,83,98(2),116-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAUDHRY DINESH AMBALAL

    Adv. A L PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court set aside the trial court's order that had acquitted the appellant of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 for possession of alcohol exceeding 20 liters. The court found the trial judge's reasoning defective and held that the evidence clearly established the offense, warranting conviction under Section 48(2) of the Act. The revision petition was allowed, the acquittal order was overturned, and the case was remanded for appropriate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court set aside the trial court's order that had acquitted the appellant of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 for possession of alcohol exceeding 20 liters. The court found the trial judge's reasoning defective and held that the evidence clearly established the offense, warranting conviction under Section 48(2) of the Act. The revision petition was allowed, the acquittal order was overturned, and the case was remanded for appropriate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case