ROHIT RAMPAL CHAUDHRY vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 37/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJAH010010942026
Filing Number
37/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192002260101
Police Station
ASLALI POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHIT RAMPAL CHAUDHRY
Adv. J T PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary: The Gujarat High Court dismissed the applicant's revision application seeking interim custody of a truck seized with 3,751 bottles of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (worth ₹8,78,300) under prohibition laws. The court held that Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act explicitly restricts magistrates from releasing seized vehicles on interim basis when the liquor quantity exceeds the prescribed threshold (20 liters under current notification), and therefore the trial court's rejection of the custody request was legally valid and required no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2026
Summary: The Gujarat High Court dismissed the applicant's revision application seeking interim custody of a truck seized with 3,751 bottles of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (worth ₹8,78,300) under prohibition laws. The court held that Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act explicitly restricts magistrates from releasing seized vehicles on interim basis when the liquor quantity exceeds the prescribed threshold (20 liters under current notification), and therefore the trial court's rejection of the custody request was legally valid and required no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts