BADSHAHKHAN FIROJKHAN AKBARKHAN PATHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 485/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010010692026

Case disposed

Filing Number

485/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

485/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191028230301

Police Station

VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483(1)
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302,506(2),120(B)
BOMBAY POLICE (GUJARAT AMENDMENT AND VALIDATION) ACT Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

BADSHAHKHAN FIROJKHAN AKBARKHAN PATHAN

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

05-03-2026

HEARING

20-02-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court rejected the interim bail application of Badshahkhan Firojkhan Akbarkhan Pathan, who is charged with murder under IPC Sections 302, 506(2), and 120(B). The judge ruled that financial hardship and family care concerns are insufficient grounds for interim bail, which is granted only in exceptional circumstances like medical emergencies or compelling humanitarian reasons, not common economic difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the interim bail application of Badshahkhan Firojkhan Akbarkhan Pathan, who is charged with murder under IPC Sections 302, 506(2), and 120(B). The judge ruled that financial hardship and family care concerns are insufficient grounds for interim bail, which is granted only in exceptional circumstances like medical emergencies or compelling humanitarian reasons, not common economic difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case