BADSHAHKHAN FIROJKHAN AKBARKHAN PATHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 485/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010010692026
Filing Number
485/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
485/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
5-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191028230301
Police Station
VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BADSHAHKHAN FIROJKHAN AKBARKHAN PATHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court rejected the interim bail application of Badshahkhan Firojkhan Akbarkhan Pathan, who is charged with murder under IPC Sections 302, 506(2), and 120(B). The judge ruled that financial hardship and family care concerns are insufficient grounds for interim bail, which is granted only in exceptional circumstances like medical emergencies or compelling humanitarian reasons, not common economic difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 485/2026
The court rejected the interim bail application of Badshahkhan Firojkhan Akbarkhan Pathan, who is charged with murder under IPC Sections 302, 506(2), and 120(B). The judge ruled that financial hardship and family care concerns are insufficient grounds for interim bail, which is granted only in exceptional circumstances like medical emergencies or compelling humanitarian reasons, not common economic difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts